APREA Logo

Knowledge Hub

  • Flex operators returned to growth in H2 2021 as an uptick in leasing volume brought an end to a phase of consolidation.
  • Cautious growth is expected to continue in 2022 amid an increase in enterprise demand from tech firms and business services companies. Interest is also growing among financial companies, life sciences and consumer product firms.
  • In response to evolving occupier demand, flex operators are increasingly providing a more diverse space offering, with changes being made to pricing models, centre networks and technology.
  • Landlords are becoming more involved in providing flex options in their properties as traditional landlord-tenant approaches give way to partnerships, management agreements and owner-operator models.

This report was originally published in https://apacresearch.cbre.com/en/research-and-reports/Asia-Pacific-Report—Asia-Pacific-Flex-Space-Market-Bounces-Back

Please find below the rebalancing results (effective 20 June 2022 start of trading) for the:

  • GPR/APREA Investable 100 Index
  • GPR/APREA Investable REIT 100 Index
  • GPR/APREA Composite Index

GPR/APREA Composite REIT Index (indicated with an asterisk)


GPR/APREA Investable 100 Index

Inclusions

AUS Shopping Centres Australasia Property Group
CHN Agile Group Holdings Limited
JPN Mitsubishi Estate Logistics REIT Investment Corporation
PHL SM Prime Holdings

Exclusions

CHN Kaisa Group Holdings Ltd. Liquidity too low
HKG Wharf Holdings Liquidity too low
JPN Hulic REIT Liquidity too low
JPN Kenedix Retail REIT Corp Liquidity too low

GPR/APREA Investable REIT 100 Index

Inclusions

JPN Healthcare & Medical Investment Corporation
NZL Precinct Properties New Zealand Ltd
SGP CDL Hospitality Trusts

Exclusions

JPN Tosei REIT Investment Corporation Liquidity too low
SGP Cromwell REIT Liquidity too low

GPR/APREA Composite Index

Inclusions

THA Dusit Thani Freehold and Leasehold Property Fund *
THA Sena J Property PCL


Exclusions
None

ESG savvy multinationals are in a tight race towards net zero by 2030. Many know that being a responsible corporate citizen is not only good for the planet—it is good for the bottom line. At the same time, investors are keen to unlock funds for those who not only talk the talk about reducing emissions but walk the walk with quantifiable solutions. And a sure thing is electrifying buildings through green sources.

It is well documented by climate experts that a significant proportion of emissions arise from commercial real estate, with carbon dioxide and methane gases typical byproducts from operating workplaces. Emissions spike in tropical and sub-tropical climes that require year-round air conditioning or northern climes that need to heat and illuminate workdays with short daylight hours. In its 2019 report, the World Green Building Council noted that “building and construction are responsible for 39% of all carbon emissions in the world, with operational emissions (from energy used to heat, cool and light buildings) accounting for 28%. The remaining 11% comes from embodied carbon emissions, or ‘upfront’ carbon that is associated with materials and construction processes throughout the whole building lifecycle. WorldGBC’s vision to fully decarbonise the sector requires eliminating both operational and embodied carbon emissions.”    

Keeping corporate eyes on the renewable energy prize helps companies focus on combating reliance on existing power grids that historically burn fossil fuels. “Our buildings can definitely be powered by 100% renewable energy sources,” ascertains Lisa Hinde, Head of Sustainability | Asia Pacific, Real Estate Management Services. “Many existing buildings are currently cycling out equipment that consumes gas on site and committing to electrification as part of their development strategy. This is supported by industry frameworks such as Green Star Building mandating electrification as the only pathway to a 6-star rating.  


While most Asia Pacific countries have a percentage of sustainable energy sources in place—wind in Thailand, geothermal in the Philippines and Indonesia, and hydro in New Zealand are a few examples—Rick Thomas, Managing Director | Emerging Markets, explains that they are all at varying stages of maturity. “The real estate industry should find a common rating system and governments should mandate or implement a policy that part of the power supply has to be green,” he suggests. “It is always a combination of policy plus sentiment and appetite. If multinationals demand 5-or-6-star rated buildings, developers will have to build them.”

Lisa notes that as renewables become a larger percentage of the grid, buildings powered by electricity will naturally decarbonize. “Our reporting systems are now set up to recognize this transition,” she notes. “They allow organizations with net zero targets to capture cost savings associated with electricity-based consumption.” In Australia, the National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) has recently announced changes to emissions factors in 2025 and 2030 that will reflect the growing presence of renewable energy in the grid. This will make it increasingly difficult to maintain existing NABERS ratings in buildings that retain gas systems.

According to NABERS, a 4.5 star rated building today that is 100% electric will improve, whereas a building with 50% gas contribution will fall incrementally. 

This may impact access to green finance and meeting obligations under green lease schedules, putting buildings with gas systems at higher risk in these categories than 100% electric buildings. 

On the operations side, Rick advises for asset managers to be one step ahead to exceed the expectations of occupiers. “They should have solid green programs in place that outlines how the majority of electricity can come from green sources,” he states.

Electrifying buildings through green sources is universally beneficial. Landlords and occupiers that get on board now reap huge dividends in the long run as sustainable energy sources become more widely adopted to combat climate change. “This is not just a nice environmental initiative to pursue,” says Rick. “This strategy, if executed during the appropriate time frames, will be far more cost effective in meeting or exceeding net zero targets. By working with market forces and understanding occupier demand, landlords can turn this trend into a lucrative investment strategy for their portfolio.” 

Colliers’ client DOMA has recently completed the 13,200sqm office for the ACT Government in Dickson (pictured) as the first all-electric HVAC system for Canberra and is continuing their push for all new office developments being fully electric with two new CLT offices in Canberra and Newcastle set to commence construction this year. “Removing the dependence on gas systems is not only the best decision for the environment and in line with our best practice agenda, but also reflects the expectation of our future occupiers to be operating out of a building powered by 100% renewable electricity,” said Gavin Edgar, General Manager, Development, at DOMA.

Demonstrating its commitment to promoting sustainability in the built environment, Hines’ 600 Collins Street office development in Melbourne will be fully electric as part of its 6-Star Green Star environmental certification. “ESG and reducing our industry’s carbon footprint are the pressing issues of our time, both for tenants and investors,” said Simon Nasa, Director and City Head for Hines in Melbourne. “Hines is leading the way globally in decarbonising new developments – 600 Collins will be at the forefront of sustainable design and construction, and will provide an example to the industry here in Australia of how the next generation of office space will operate to benefit its occupants and environment.”

This article was originally published in https://www.colliers.com/en-xa/news/e22-expert-talks-electrification-for-real-esg-impact

It is Allianz Real Estate’s view that ESG issues, such as climate change, are increasingly impacting the fundamentals of the real estate markets worldwide. As such, Allianz Real Estate believes that ESG needs to be integrated within its business, from the investment processes through to the way it interacts with tenants.

This document, which is based on the Allianz Real Estate ESG Group Policy, outlines its approach to integrating ESG considerations into the business processes within our investment approach. It applies to all areas of our investment activity – equity and debt, directly held and indirect – and has been adopted by all branches and hubs of Allianz Real Estate around the world. Approved by the Allianz Real Estate Executive Committee, the policy has been developed in conjunction with Allianz Climate Solutions but does not influence the own-use real estate managed by other entities within the Allianz Group. It follows Allianz’s holistic approach to the integration of corporate responsibility and particularly ESG criteria into business, which is recorded in the Allianz Group standards and governance records.

This report was originally published in https://www.allianzrealestate.com/_Resources/Persistent/306c15ef8a33b053fcc309911575501038f06b8c/ARE_ESG_Policy%20May%202021.pdf

Cohen & Steers’ commitment to investment excellence is built upon a culture of continuous improvement, and that includes our approach to ESG integration. They believe their proprietary approach to integration and engagement, combined with the framework established in the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), helps to promote transparency and has the potential to enhance their ability to deliver more consistent, attractive risk-adjusted returns.

This report was originally published in https://assets.cohenandsteers.com/assets/content/resources/insight/ESG-Evolving-Landscape_ES2050.pdf

In their Integrated Sustainability Report 2022, CDL talks about their reduction strategies to attain the goal of decarbonising towards net zero, guided by various globally-recognised disclosures such as TCFD, SASB and CDSB. They also share their determination to drive innovation and building performance, and create inclusive business environments and develop sustainable communities.

This report was originally published in https://www.cdlsustainability.com/pdf/CDL_ISR_2022.pdf


Download this report

This paper from MSCI examines the challenges presented by both climate change and the net-zero transition to investors looking to measure and manage climate risk in their portfolios. Effective management of climate risk requires a clear understanding of its multifaceted nature.

Broadly speaking, climate risk can be broken down into physical risk and transition risk, and it can impact companies and investors via both microeconomic and macroeconomic transmission channels. The transition to net-zero depends on many factors: policymakers’ decisions, the development and economic feasibility of green technologies, investors’ attitude toward climate risk and net-zero investing and consumers’ sentiment toward low-carbon consumption. This and the long horizon mean that investors face an elevated level of uncertainty when making investment decisions.

One approach is to undertake forward-looking scenario analysis, in which various outcomes for uncertain factors such as policy decisions and the development of green technology can be explored, along with their financial impacts. This is becoming a standard tool for climate risk analysis, supported by major organizations such as TCFD.

In this paper, the MSCI Climate Value-at-Risk (Climate VaR) metric is used to examine climate risk in a set of hypothetical portfolios and explore a few strategies to reduce that climate risk. A second approach could be to incorporate a carbon-emission factor in equity risk models to help quantify the impact of emissions on portfolio returns.

As more investors begin to consider the risk of climate change when making investment decisions, financial markets may see a reallocation of capital from carbon-intensive to carbon-efficient investments — and companies’ emission profiles may emerge as a systematic driver of equity returns. Although climate risk management is not yet widespread among investors or fully standardized by regulation, industry trends are pointing in this direction. Investors may therefore wish to be aware of existing approaches for measuring and managing climate risk. 

This report was originally published in https://www.msci.com/www/research-paper/net-zero-alignment-managing/03147524351


Download the report

This paper from MSCI seeks to lay out some fundamental principles and best practices for ESG reporting of short positions at a portfolio level, based on the results from MSCI’s consultation with over 20 market participants globally. It also explores related issues that influenced market participants’ views on this topic, including cost of capital, shareholder ownership, engagement and regulation.

The most important principle for long-short portfolio ESG reporting is transparency. Transparency allows both regulators and clients to more accurately assess the ESG risks and opportunities to which the fund is exposed on both the long and the short sides of the portfolio. The main difference in investor views on reporting short positions was whether the investor was assessing a company’s real-world impact or if they were focused solely on its ESG risk/return metrics.

In general, asset owners, asset managers and hedge funds agree that reporting for ESG transparency is different from reporting for ESG risk exposure, with both being important in meeting different ESG investment reporting objectives. It is therefore recommended that long-short portfolios report ESG and climate metrics separately for both the long and short legs, in addition to any preferred aggregation schemes, as this allows the greatest transparency and flexibility for aggregate portfolio reporting under both a double and financial materiality assessment.

This report was originally published in https://www.msci.com/www/research-paper/esg-reporting-in-long-short/03136460396


Download the report

With the pandemic now well into its third year, most markets in Asia Pacific have adopted a policy of living with COVID-19 as high vaccination rates, effective medical care and the emergence of weaker variants reduce the severity of the virus and remove the need for lockdowns and other related measures. The findings from CBRE’s 2022 Asia Pacific Occupier Survey, which was conducted from March-April of this year, reflect this new paradigm.The report identifies and explores the five key real estate priorities for Asia Pacific occupiers in the post-pandemic era:

  • Adopting Flexible Working as the New Normal
  • Refining Workplace Strategies and Policies
  • Augmenting Office Wellness and Sustainability
  • Facilitating a Return to the Office
  • Pursuing Long-Term Portfolio Expansion

The report also highlights the challenges that companies will need to address during this period of transformation.

Executive Summary:

  • Office: The positive momentum from end-2021 carried over to Q1 2022 as Singapore remained on the path to reopen its economy.
  • Business Parks: Occupier demand has generally improved across all submarkets, with islandwide business parks recording a positive net absorption of 186,982 sq. ft. in Q1 2022.
  • Retail: While the recovery of the retail market was still capped by restrictions on social gatherings in most of the quarter, leasing activity continued to be stable.
  • Residential: Private home price growth plateaued in Q1 2022 as cooling measures took effect. 1,716 new private homes (excluding ECs) were sold in Q1 2022, below the 5-year quarterly average of 2,614 units.
  • Industrial: The industrial market experienced broad-based growth across all segments. Due to limited availability in existing prime logistics buildings, rents inched up by another 1.4% in Q1 2022.
  • Investment: Preliminary real estate investment volume in the quarter amounted to $9.994 bn, reaching a 4-year quarterly high and just 5.2% below the Q2 2018 peak of $10.542 bn.