Knowledge Hub

AEW published a research report on climate risk. The report, authored by Hans Vrensen, Head of Research & Strategy, explores how physical climate change, in particular river floods and rising sea levels, will impact European real estate returns, and the importance of a proactive investment approach.

This report sets out MAS’ strategy on climate resilience and environmental sustainability to strengthen the resilience of Singapore’s financial sector to environmental risks, develop a vibrant green finance ecosystem, build a climate-resilient reserves portfolio, and incorporate sustainable practices.

This report was originally published in https://www.mas.gov.sg/publications/sustainability-report/2022/sustainability-report-2021-2022

Landmark research from Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School has, for the first time, shed light on how companies in the ASEAN region are addressing their obligations for climate-related reporting.

Analysis of the top 100 largest listed companies in six Southeast Asian nations – Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam – finds 70% (420 companies) published climate-related disclosures in 2020/2021. Climate Reporting in ASEAN: State of Corporate Practices analyzes those 420 businesses, focusing on their approach to reporting, materiality, risks and opportunities, governance, strategy, targets, and performance.

Key findings of the research include:

• Most of the companies (84%) report their material topics on climate change, yet only one quarter (26%) describe long-term factors related to their climate risk strategy;
• 62% of companies disclose their greenhouse gas emissions (ranging from 5% in Vietnam to 80% in the Philippines);
• A majority of businesses (56%) identify climate-related opportunities, compared with less than half (47%) sharing plans on risk mitigation;
• Three-in-four companies (74%) disclose metrics on climate-related performance, however, 46% do not share how targets are discussed;
• Two-third (68%) assign climate responsibilities to a sub-committee, while 8% link management remuneration to climate

In terms of climate reporting:

• A significant majority of sampled companies (85%) use the GRI Standards, ranging from Singapore (99%) to Vietnam (65%);
• In the six markets, reporting using other frameworks is low: 19% use TCFD, 16% apply IIRC, and 14% use SASB;
• At 76%, reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals is widespread by the companies in all six countries, with those from Thailand (95%) and Indonesia (93%) leading the way.

This report was originally published in https://globalreporting.org/news/news-center/asean-companies-get-serious-about-climate-change/

By Alton Wong, Executive Director, Co-head of Sustainability Services, Greater China, Cushman & Wakefield

For businesses in carbon-intensive industries, the challenge of reducing Scope 1 emissions (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) can be great.

For service-based organizations, Scope 1 emissions may represent only a single-digit percentage of their entire carbon output. In these cases, the majority of their emissions are Scope 3 – they originate further up or down their supply chain through the activities of their suppliers.

So how do service businesses, like financial institutions and consultancies, reduce what they cannot control?

The data challenge

Any carbon reduction journey begins with reporting: you cannot manage what you cannot measure. While we have seen an increase in queries on ISO14064 – the international standard for reporting greenhouse gas emissions – reporting requires data, and capturing reliable data is the greatest challenge we see across the region.

In many cases, the data needed even to establish a baseline year – the year to which emissions will be compared – is not captured. While most, but not all, companies have utility data, few capture emissions for business travel or employee transport. This problem is compounded when tackling Scope 3 emissions.

Collaboration is the only way forward

As a service organization ourselves, Cushman & Wakefield’s Scope 3 emissions account for greater than 98 percent of our total emissions. That is why a key pillar of our net zero commitment is to engage our clients in their own carbon reduction journeys.

For businesses like ours, achieving a net zero commitment – which includes Scopes 1, 2 and 3 – is dependent on our supply chain doing the same. The good news is that it is a two-way street: by reducing our own direct emissions (by implementing energy efficiencies such as updated HVAC and LED lighting, for example) we are also bringing down the Scope 3 emissions of our clients. Similarly, when our clients implement energy efficiencies (their Scope 1), they reduce our Scope 3.

As more companies set net-zero targets, it is increasingly apparent that we are all in this together. At Cushman & Wakefield we have our own data challenges to overcome – especially around Scope 3 emissions. Like all companies, we are working hard to constantly improve, and to share our learnings with others, because we know that we will not reach net zero alone.

Alton Wong, MRICS

Executive Director,
Head of Advisory Services,
Valuation & Advisory Services, Greater China
Co-head of Sustainability Services
Cushman & Wakefield

Alton Wong, MRICS

Executive Director,
Head of Advisory Services,
Valuation & Advisory Services, Greater China
Co-head of Sustainability Services
Cushman & Wakefield

Alton is the Executive Director and Head of Advisory Services in the Valuation & Advisory Department, Greater China as well as Co-head of Sustainability Services, with over 16 years of experience in valuation and advisory services, particularly for due diligence, auditing, public document and financing purposes in Hong Kong, Mainland China and other Asia Pacific countries.

Leading the Greater China Advisory Services team, Alton provides valuation, feasibility and market study, market positioning, performance assessment, development advisory services etc., which covering different areas of alternative investments, including senior housing, logistics property, data centre and life science park.

He also has extensive experience in environmental, social and governance (ESG) advisory services, covering ESG ratings, Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB), Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), energy solutions, sustainable development, green/ wellbeing building certifications services etc. He is also our committee member of C&W’s Global Corporate Social Responsibility team.

Alton is also one of the drafting members of the HKIS Valuation Standards 2017 and 2020 editions.